TILCA

Teaching Italian Language and Culture Annual

Codice etico TILCA (Code of Ethnics TILCA)

TILCA (Teaching Italian Language and Culture Annual) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that follows the code of ethics for publications drawn up by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), whose guidelines are shared by the Publisher, the Editorial Board, the authors and the referees.

 

1. Accountability and responsibility for journal content

Journal’s editors take responsibility for all works published on TILCA They strive to grant both scientific and editorial quality by double-blind peer review and careful editing. The journal maintains the integrity of the published record and grants long time preservation of all published content

2. Editorial independence and integrity

2.1 Independence of editorial decisions from commercial interests

TILCA editors make their decisions about proposals submitted to the journal and published works on academic merit alone and take full responsibility for their decisions.

TILCA embraces an open access policy and has no commercial interest, so the journal’s editorial processes and editors’ decisions are independent of any commercial consideration.

2.2 Editors’ relationship to the journal publisher

TILCA editors work on a volunteer basis. The journal’s website is hosted by John D. Calandra Italian American Institute, Queen College, CUNY, NY (USA)  a public institution which has a scientific research mission and does not interfere with TILCA editors’ freedom of choice and activities, as long as their work is coherent with the scholarly mission of the journal.

2.3 Editors’ relationship to the journal publisher

The percentage of published research articles in which the author (or one of the authors) is a member of the Editorial Board or reviewer must not exceed 25% in the last two issues published.

Articles written by an author who is a member of the Editorial Board are guaranteed a review process in line with the Code of Ethics and free of conflicts of interest. An author’s membership of journal boards is made explicit in the full-text or metadata of the article.

2.4 Journal metrics and decision-making

TILCA editors do not attempt to influence the journal’s ranking by artificially increasing any journal metric. In particular, they strive to ensure that submitted papers are reviewed on purely scholarly grounds and that authors are not pressured to cite specific publications for non- scholarly reasons.

3. Editorial confidentiality

3.1 Authors’ material

TILCA selects papers to be published through double-blind peer review. Peer reviewers are chosen by editors, who strive to protect the confidentiality of authors’ material and remind reviewers to do so as well. Editors do not give any indication of a paper’s status with the journal to anyone other than the authors. In the case of a misconduct investigation, it may be necessary to disclose material to third parties (e.g., an institutional investigation committee or other editors).

 

3.2 Reviewers

TILCA selects papers to be published through double-blind peer review.

Therefore, reviewers’ identities are always protected, unless an alleged or suspected reviewer’s misconduct compels the journal to disclose the reviewer’s name to a third party.

General editorial policies

4. Encourage maximum transparency and good publishing ethics

TILCA aims at granting authors, readers, reviewers, and all other parties involved maximum transparency and complete and honest reporting about its work.

4.1 Authorship and responsibility

All signing authors of works published on TILCA take responsibility for the conduct and validity of their research and for what is written in their contributions. Authors acknowledge that all contents are published under a Creative Commons Licence CC BY SA.

Should any authorship dispute arise, it will be resolved at the appropriate institutional level or through other appropriate independent bodies. TILCA editors will then act on the findings, for example by correcting authorship in published works.

4.2 Conflicts of interest and role of the funding source

Authors are required to declare any relevant financial or non-financial conflict of interest at the moment they submit their papers for publication on TILCA. Declarations of conflicting interests are published alongside the paper so that readers are informed about them.

 

4.3 Authors’ publishing ethics

TILCA editors work to ensure that all published papers make a substantial new contribution to their field. They encourage authors to place their work in the context of previous work (i.e., to state why this work was necessary/done, what this work adds or why a replication of previous work was required, and what readers should take away from it).

 

5. Responding to criticisms and concerns

TILCA welcomes and encourages criticism and debate.

5.1 Ensuring integrity of the published record – corrections

When genuine errors in works published on TILCA are pointed out by readers, authors, or editors, which do not render the work invalid, a correction (or erratum) will be published as soon as possible. The paper will be corrected with a date of correction. If the error renders the work or substantial parts of it invalid, the paper will be retracted with an explanation as to the reason for retraction (i.e., honest error). Retracted papers will be retained online, and they will be prominently marked as a retraction in all online versions, including the PDF, for the benefit of future readers.

5.2 Ensuring the integrity of the published record – suspected research or publication misconduct

If serious concerns are raised by readers, reviewers, or others, about the conduct, validity, or reporting of works published on TILCA the editors of the journal will initially contact the authors and allow them to respond to the concerns. If that response is unsatisfactory, editors will take the matter to the appropriate institutional level. The editors of TILCA will also do their best to respond to findings from research integrity organisations that indicate misconduct relating to works published on TILCA. Editors can themselves decide to retract a paper if they are convinced that serious misconduct has happened even if an investigation by an institution or national body does not recommend it. Editors will respond to all allegations or suspicions of research or publication misconduct raised by readers, reviewers, or other editors. In general, they acknowledge collective responsibility for the research record of the journal and will act whenever they become aware of potential misconduct if at all possible.

5.3 Encourage scholarly debate

TILCA welcomes readers’ criticisms to works published by the journal and will consider publishing them to foster scientific debate, as long as they are proposed in a timely manner. The authors of the original works will be given the opportunity to reply to further promote the debate. Any criticisms that raise the possibility of misconduct will be further investigated even if they are received a long time after publication.

 

6. Ensuring a fair and appropriate peer review process

TILCA editors organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. The peer review processes is clearly explained in the information for authors’ page on the journal’s website, where it is also indicated which parts of the journal are peer reviewed.

6.1 Decision whether to review

TILCA editors may reject a paper without peer review (desk-rejection) when it is deemed unsuitable for the journal’s readers or is of poor quality. This decision is made in a fair and unbiased way and the criteria used to make this decision are made explicit to the author. The decision not to send a paper for peer review is only based on the academic content of the paper, without regard to their race, gender, age, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the political philosophy.

6.2 Interaction with peer reviewers

TILCA editors use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest. TILCA editors ensure that reviews are received in a timely manner. Peer reviewers are told what is expected of them and are informed about any changes in editorial policies. Peer reviewers are asked to assess research and publication ethics issues (i.e., whether they think the research was done and reported ethically, or if they have any suspicions of plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, or redundant publication). TILCA editors have a policy to request a formal conflict of interest declaration from peer reviewers and ask peer reviewers to inform them about any such conflict of interest at the earliest opportunity so that they can make a decision on whether an unbiased review is possible. Certain conflicts of interest may disqualify a peer reviewer.

TILCA editors stress confidentiality of the material to peer reviewers.

 

6.3 Reviewer misconduct

TILCA editors take reviewer misconduct seriously and pursue any allegation of breach of confidentiality, non-declaration of conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), inappropriate use of confidential material, or delay of peer review for competitive advantage. Allegations of serious reviewer misconduct, such as plagiarism, are taken to the institutional level.

 

6.4 Interaction with authors

TILCA editors make it clear to authors that the role of the peer reviewer is to provide recommendations on acceptance or rejection. Correspondence from editors is usually with the corresponding author, who have the responsibility to involve co-authors at all stages. TILCA editors communicate with all authors at first submission and at final acceptance stage to ensure all authors are aware of the submission and have approved the publication. Normally, TILCA editors pass on all peer reviewers’ comments in their entirety. However, in exceptional cases, it may be necessary to exclude parts of a review, if it, for example, contains libellous or offensive remarks.

TILCA editors guarantee that such editorial discretion is not inappropriately used to suppress inconvenient comments. Should there be good reasons to involve additional reviewers at a late stage in the process, it is clearly communicated to authors. The final editorial decision and reasons for this are clearly communicated to authors and reviewers. If a paper is rejected, TILCA editors welcome appeals from authors. Editors, however, are not obliged to overturn their decision.

 

7. Editorial decision-making

TILCAeditors guarantee that decisions on publications are as fair and unbiased as possible.

8.1 Editorial and journal processes

All editorial processes are made clear in the information for authors on the journal’s webpage, where it is stated what is expected of authors, which types of papers are published, and how papers are handled by the journal. All editors are fully familiar with the journal policies, vision, and scope. The final responsibility for all decisions rests with the managing editor.

 

7.2 Editorial conflicts of interest

TILCA editors are not involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest, for example if they work or have worked in the same institution and collaborated with the authors, if they own stock in a particular company, or if they have a personal relationship with the authors. TILCA has a process in place to handle papers submitted by editors or editorial board members to ensure unbiased and independent handling of such papers. This process is stated in the information for authors.

For the referees: TILCA Guide for referees